Chem 12: Concept of the Week
Chapter 11- Properties of Solutions
Textbook: Chemistry, Fourth Edition
Steven S. Zumdahl
Houghton Mifflin Company, 1997
In chapter 10, we examined the properties of pure liquids and
solids. It is necessary to understand these states of matter in
order to understand what is happening, on a molecular level, when
solutions are formed.
Recall that solutions are also known as homogeneous mixtures.
Although the most commonly-encountered solutions are those prepared
by dissolving a solid solute in a liquid solvent, there are also
solutions in the gaseous state (air is a good example) and the
solid state (a nickel coin is a solution of 75% copper and 25%
nickel.)
Solution Composition
There are many ways to express the concentration of a solution.
Probably the most common method of indicating the concentration
of a solution of a solid in a liquid is
molarity, which
is the number of moles of solute divided by the volume of the
solution, and was already discussed in chapter 4.
Notice that the molarity of a solution depends on the solution
volume, which changes with temperature (most liquids expand at
higher temperature). Thus, the molarity of a solution changes
with temperature.
Some other methods of expressing concentration are:
- mass percentage
: the mass percentage of a solute in
a solution is equal to 100 times the mass of the solute divided
by the mass of the solution (not solvent!.) Mass percentage
has no units.
- mole fraction
: the mole fraction of a solute in a solution
is equal to the number of moles of solute divided by the total
number of moles in the solution (moles of solute plus moles of
solvent.) If the solution consists of more than one solute, then
the denominator is the sum of the moles of all components. Mole
fraction has no units.
- mole percentage: mole percentage is simply mole fraction
multiplied by 100.
- molality
(abbreviated m): the molality of a
solute in a solution is equal to the number of moles of solute
divided by the number of kilograms of solvent. Notice that
since the molality of a solution is determined by the masses
of solute and solvent, it is temperature independent. Do not use
m as an abbreviation for moles.
- normality
: the normality of a solution is defined as
the number of equivalents of solute per liter of solution. This
only makes sense, or course, if the meaning of an equivalent is
understood. The definition of a chemical equivalent depends on
the substance or type of chemical reaction under consideration.
Three common situations are described below and in your textbook:
- For an acid, one equivalent is that mass which will supply
one mole of hydrogen ions. For hydrochloric acid, which is monoprotic,
one equivalent is the same as one mole. For sulfuric acid, which
is diprotic, one mole contains two equivalents. In other words,
the number of equivalents is a whole-number multiple
of the number of moles: #eq = (n)(#moles), where n represents
the number of ionizable hydrogens in the acid. On the other hand,
the equivalent mass of an acid is always either the
same as the molar mass or a whole-number fraction (1/2, 1/3, 1/4,
etc.) of the molar mass. Thus, the equivalent mass of sulfuric
acid is one-half the molar mass, and thus one mole of sulfuric
acid contains two equivalents when sulfuric acid participates
in an acid/base reaction.
- For a base, one equivalent is that mass which will react with
one mole of hydrogen ions. For sodium hydroxide NaOH, the equivalent
mass is the same as the molar mass. For magnesium hydroxide, Mg(OH)2,
the equivalent mass is one-half the molar mass, and one mole contains
two equivalents when magnesium hydroxide participates in an acid/base
reaction.
- For a substance involved in a redox reaction, one equivalent
is that mass which gains (if it is reduced) or loses (if it is
oxidized) one mole of electrons per mole of the substance.
For example, for the following unbalanced (and incomplete) redox
reaction,
FeSO4 + KMnO4 ----> MnSO4
+ Fe2(SO4)3
the equivalent masses of each of the substances are shown in the
following table (determine the oxidation numbers of the transition
elements so you'll understand the table):

Normality and equivalents are not used as commonly as they were a few
decades ago, but they are useful for a simple reason: by definition,
one equivalent of any reactant will react completely with one
equivalent of each of the other reactants to yield one equivalent
of each of the products. In other words, equivalent ratios
for chemical reactions are always 1:1. The same can't be
said for mole ratios.
As a result of this concept, two points should be noted:
- Stoichiometric calculations can be performed using equivalents
even if the equation isn't balanced. For example, consider the
following question: "How many grams of ferric sulfate are
produced if 50 g of FeSO4 react with 30 g of KMnO4,
according to the above reaction?" To answer this using standard
stoichiometric calculations, the equation must be balanced. If
we use equivalents, we can reason in the following manner to get
a ballpark estimate of the answer (refer to the table above for
the equivalent masses):
- 50 g of FeSO4 divided by the equivalent mass gives
about 1/3 of an equivalent of FeSO4.
- 30 grams of KMnO4 divided by the equivalent mass
gives about one equivalent of KMnO4.
- Thus, this is a limiting reactant problem, and the limiting
reactant is FeSO4. Note that this can be determined
directly, without having to worry about mole ratios.
- The number of equivalents of Fe2(SO4)3
produced is equal to the number of equivalents of limiting reactant
consumed, which is about one-third of an equivalent.
- The mass of ferric sulfate formed is equal to the number of
equivalents multiplied by the equivalent mass. Thus, about 1/3
of 200 grams, or about 67 grams, of ferric sulfate are produced.
- The equation N1V1 = N2V2
can be used to do stoichiometric calculations for reactions in
solution, where 1 and 2 represent either two reactants, two products,
or a reactant and a product in a reaction. (Just as molarity multiplied
by volume gives moles, normality multiplied by volume (in liters)
gives equivalents.)
The Formation of Solutions
Whether or not two substances mix with one another to form a solution
depends on the relative magnitude of three quantities (note: we
symbolize solvent by S and solute by U):
- U-U interactions: which types of intermolecular attractive
forces exist between solute molecules? Can you see now why an
understanding of the previous chapter
is necessary to answer this
question?
- S-S interactions: which types of intermolecular attractive
forces exist between solvent molecules?
- S-U interactions: which types of intermolecular attractive
forces exist between solute molecules and solvent molecules?
If S-U is comparable in magnitude to U-U and/or S-S, then the
two substances will generally form a solution. If, on the other
hand, U-U and/or S-S are significantly stronger than S-U, then
a solution will generally not result. Consider the following four
situations:
Color coding of U-U, S-S, and S-U columns: red = strong attractions,
yellow = intermediate attractions, green = weak attractions.

Colligative Properties
Colligative properties which depend only on the number, not type,
of solute particles present in solution. The four colligative
properties considered in chapter 11 are:
- Vapor pressure lowering: the vapor pressure of a solvent
is reduced by the presence of a solute in the solvent. The solute
can be either a nonvolatile solute or another liquid which has
an appreciable vapor pressure. Raoult's Law can be used
to calculate the vapor pressure of a solution. For a two-component
solution,

where X represents the Greek letter chi, for the mole fraction
of the component, and p0 represents the vapor pressure
of the pure component. The above equation can be used directly
for a mixture of two liquids. See Sample Exercise 11.7, page 526,
for an application of this equation.)
When the solute is a nonvolatile solid, the vapor pressure is
zero, so the above equation reduces to

Sample Exercise 11.5, page 521, is an example of the use of this
equation.
It is important to remember that solutes which dissociate in water
produce more particles than a nonelectrolyte. For example, if
separate solutions of sugar and sodium chloride have equal mole
fractions, the salt solution will depress the vapor pressure of
the water twice as much as the sugar solution, since the sodium
chloride produces two moles of particles in solution (one mole
of each of the ions) per mole of substance dissolved, while the
sugar produces one mole of dissolved particles per mole of sugar.
- Boiling Point Elevation: the presence of a solute
raises the boiling point of a solvent. The extent of elevation
is directly proportional to the molality
of the solution. Since
molarity is temperature-dependent, the concentration unit molality
is used instead:

where delta Tb is the change in boiling point,
i (called the van't Hoff factor) represents the number
of particles in solution for each mole of solute dissolved, m
is the molality, and Kb is called the molal boiling
point elevation constant. The only thing which determines Kb
is the solvent. The table below illustrates the meaning of the
van't Hoff factor:
| Example | Ideal Value for i
| Comments |
| Any nonelectrolyte | 1
| no dissociation |
| Weak electrolyte | between 1 and 2
| partial ionization |
| NaCl | 2
| 1:1 strong electrolyte |
| CaCl2 | 3
| 1:2 strong electrolyte |
| Na2SO4
| 3 | 2:1 strong electrolyte
|
| AlCl3 | 4
| 1:3 strong electrolyte |
Actually, the ideal value for i in the table is only for
1:1 electrolytes, and even then only at infinite dilution. At
higher concentrations, ion pairing occurs (some ions move through
the solution as pairs, effectively reducing the number of particles
in solution.) Furthermore, for multiply-charged ions, ion pairing
is more likely (because of stronger coulombic attraction) even
at lower concentrations. Table 11.6 (page 536) compares the actual
and expected values of i for several electrolytes at equimolar
concentrations.
- Freezing Point Depression: the presence of a solute
lowers the freezing point of a solvent. The extent of depression
is directly proportional to the molality
of the solution:

where delta Tf is the change in freezing point,
i (called the van't Hoff factor) represents the number
of particles in solution for each mole of solute dissolved, m
is the molality, and Kf is called the molal freezing
point depression constant. The only thing which determines Kf
is the solvent.
- Osmotic Pressure: The term osmotic pressure only has
meaning for a solution; in other words, pure solvents don't have
osmotic pressures. If a solution is placed on one side of a semipermeable
membrane and the pure solvent is placed on the other side, solvent
moves across the membrane (thereby diluting the solution) at a
faster rate than solvent moves from the solution to the side containing
pure solvent. As a result, the volume of the solution increases
and the volume of the pure solvent necessarily decreases. At equilibrium,
when there is no longer any change in the volumes, the difference
in the two levels, expressed as pressure, is called the osmotic
pressure. An equivalent way of defining osmotic pressure is
the pressure which has to be applied to the solution side to prevent
any increase in volume. Osmotic pressure, like vapor pressure
lowering, boiling point elevation, and freezing point depression,
is a colligative property.
The osmotic pressure of a solution
can be determined by the equation,

where pi is the osmotic pressure, i is the van't Hoff factor,
M is the molarity of the solution, R is the gas constant
(in the form 0.08206 liter-atm/mol-K), and T is the absolute temperature.
Note that units cancel in such a way that the osmotic pressure
is expressed in atmospheres.
AS ALWAYS - READ THE SUMMARY AT THE END OF THE CHAPTER.
Return to Concept of the Week Page
Return to Chem 12 Home Page
Last modified December 15, 1998